T​he course gives a nice general overview, but lacks detail. The psychologicals aspect are very interesting, but the connection to Cyber Security are rare. The scripts of Prof. Goels lectures have some significant errrors. Whoever wrote the script seemed to have some problems to understand either Prof. Goel or the topic.

O​verall, an interesting course that could go deeper in detail.

si bien es interesante el tema quedan muchas preguntas a resumir se necesitaria mas ejercicios asi el alumno investiga, y trabajar sobre mas textos y describir mas juridicciones.

Although it is interesting the topic are many questions to summarize would need more exercises so the student investigates, and work on more texts and describe more legal

Some of the supporting reading materials were dated and did not reflect the current thinking or state of play in the cyber security space. The course could have benefited from spending significantly more time discussing actual international cyber conflict case studies than the theory or psychology underlying cyber security theory.

The videos were not always easy to understand because of the unclear pronouncing of the key speaker. Also although most of the tests were easy to complete, the ones that you had to write the answer down instead of only choosing the correct answer, were hard since if one word you wrote was wrong you lost the question.

While the relevance of the content was good, the implementation was very text heavy: lectures suffered from absense of visual material (use more words as fill), there was a bit too much reading involved and the estimated time required to do the reading was perhaps one third of the actual time it takes.

Much of the literature was unavailable which I think is a downside. Also, while interesting, the topics were covered only superficially and I felt that that questions during the videos and at the end of the module were very easy and did not challenge the participant to think or research.

This was a very difficult course due to the rate at which the instructor spoke and his dialect. The pacing was off and I found that I had to keep going back to read the transcript just to know which words he was pronouncing.

The English of one of the professors is rather hard to understand (and at times completely unintelligible); the subtitles are not really helpful in these instances (and at times they are clearly incorrect/misleading).

Could make use of more real world examples. Hacktivism and individual actors receive more attention than they deserve given their extremely limited capabilities. Over all a good class though.

While informative and interesting, I believe the course hadn't been updated in a few years and some of the links to further readings didn't work. I really enjoyed what I studied.

I like the comparisons between past physical wars and current cyberwar. However, the course take the long way to explain very basic elements of nations interactions and trust.

Professor quality was not up to expected. Material was interesting, but lectures could have been less monotone. Some of the links to reading material were broken.

An interesting course, informative, yet the instructor speaks in a nervous way and can be very challenging to understand well from him and enjoy the course

Cyber topic speaker needs more speaking practice: too wooden, h. Need to include downloadable files of lecture slides.

Content is not always focused on main topic and questions of quizzes are not clear, answers are ambiguous.

Informative, however Indian dude's pronunciation is awful, luckily they have subtitles.

It's Ok, nothing much to gain iin terms of knowledge realted to cyber conflict.

Way too basic: about everything and nothing at the same time.

Wished the course was a deeper dive into this area.

Was ok, got a little boring after week 2

I felt the course was incomplete

great work with best effort

Not very challenging.

Not very in depth.

Too much generic