Nov 23, 2018
Very nice course, it gives good understanding of OOP features of Go. I liked a lot course's assignments also. Thanks, Pr. Ian Harris !
Aug 02, 2019
cool stuff,\n\nhelped to get a good overview of how go is different but still basically the same as most other languages.
por Emilio H C•
Oct 20, 2019
The course is well designed to allow studens to catch up with go features. The graded assestments are great to inmediatly apply what you've learned. I enjoyed this course.
por Devon E•
Nov 09, 2019
por Nir M•
Nov 12, 2019
Informative and useful!
por Andreas M•
Nov 14, 2019
I just love the way Professor Harris is teaching all these concepts!
por Rob S•
Dec 17, 2018
Good flow to this course, but again - I suggest replacing the peer review process with automated test-based grading and fleshing out the assignments a bit more.
Jan 07, 2019
Couple of interesting chapters and assignment. I though an additional chapter related to benchmark and testing is missing however in this module. Could make a great add on with assignment to test and benchmark latest assignment of the module.
por Robin Z•
Mar 20, 2019
Nice follow-up on the first course, wish more focus would have been put on using interfaces
por Roberto L•
Oct 23, 2018
Error in question of quiz for week 3
por Luiz C•
Nov 08, 2018
Course is concise, though going through some advances concepts of functional programming. Presentation is ok. Examples and Final Exercises could be more interesting/challening
por Hongyi L•
Oct 28, 2018
The course given by Ian is great. But I wish there would be a TA in future.
por Vladimir V•
Oct 08, 2018
por Seyed M H M•
Oct 01, 2018
Good course . again few error on quiz and materials
por Maxim C•
Jun 28, 2019
Still there are errors in the tests
por Alec J•
May 21, 2019
I'll say again what I said regarding the first course in this series. The teacher is good, and the material is valuable, but the fact that students have to grade each others' work is ridiculous, and actually kind of angering, if I'm honest. Why would you trust me to grade someone else's work, while I'm learning it at the same time they are? Who knows? Maybe I'm an idiot. Even if I'm bright and hard-working, I won't have the same insight as an instructor would, looking at the same material. This is pedagogically difficult to justify, and I can only believe that it's meant to shield the instructor from the drudgery of the task.
por Alexander B•
Sep 07, 2019
An awesome course!
por Anh D•
Nov 02, 2019
There is problem with answers of quiz but no update until now
por Chauncey G S J•
Nov 11, 2019
Assignment 4 was telling us to create each Animal type: Bird, Cow, Snake with a name field of string type, but this was not required. There were other issues with wrong answers on quiz questions as well. The quiz question issues were well documented by other students in the forums.
por Vsevolod V•
Mar 09, 2019
Quizzes and assignments contain mistakes, which make it hard (and in some cases impossible) to make it right.
por Armin K•
Mar 13, 2019
Way too easy and way too little background information or depth, plus lack of real-world examples and a lot of inaccurate information.
por Edward H•
Mar 20, 2019
The programming assignment workload is reasonable, but there is little support and discussion to support a newbie programmer. Also I believe a graphic display of user input and the program outputs would be much easier to understand. Reading off the instructions are too open to interpretation.
There is also the grading scheme is not fine-grained enough. It could utilized better to provide a more structured approach to a solution.
loop (1 mark)
use of map ( 1 mark)
user of slice ( 1 mark)
So there will be 10 chcekpoints to verify and validate.
Using 2 points as aggregate scores, did not help to achieve that goal. It penalised students excessively in my opinins.
por David L•
Jun 16, 2019
Not an intermediate course, more like a beginner course for me. Too much background info which is not go related eg why functions, what are good properties of functions, this is too generic and beginner material
Examples are not good: bad variable and function names, non-practical or even confusing/misleading
Important topics are covered, explainations are ok (but could be better)
por Phil H•
Jul 10, 2019
An ok course. Lots of annoying typos in the slides, and the instructor seems to stumble over some of the explanation. In the end, it did teach me the basics of go functions and OO concepts.
por Sylvain T•
May 14, 2019
The topic is good, however the videos really have this old-school touch- you know, the very reason you choose to go to Coursera and not back to some class bench. Evaluations would also benefit from a good review, too much frustating inconsistencies for my (and many people on the forums) taste.
por Terence S•
May 19, 2019
There were a few inaccuracies which might be confusing for newcomers to the language. It would be good if the instructor or someone else with editing permissions could take a look at the feedback and act on it.
por Serge T•
Mar 25, 2019
quite a lot of mistakes in study materials and tests