Opiniones y comentarios de aprendices correspondientes a How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course) por parte de École Polytechnique
Acerca del Curso
Principales reseñas
The content was very good and explanation was excellent just there was a slight problem with instructors accent but don't worry you will get used to it no time but the course is excellent and helpful
It was really helpful to me, I hope it will be useful to all researchers who are intensively working for publishing papers in journals. I thank all course instructors who handled the video sessions.
726 - 750 de 750 revisiones para How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course)
por Massimiliano B
•I would suggest to be more simple and effective. Discuss concrete cases and details of a about errors and structure of a paper. But really appreciate that the cours is given from PHDs students!
por Syed W H N
•The content was fine and went pretty smoothly. The real problem was the hassle of getting the accent of most of the instructors. Plus, there're a lot of mistakes in the subtitles as well.
por Sultan B M
•Good course for PHD students. Also, it can be beneficial for non academic papers which intended to be submitted industrial conferences.
por Yasser A A
•The content of the course is good but the review process need to be improved. The assignments should be reviewed by the instructors
por Ar S S u R
•INITIAL PEER GRADING WAS NOT VERY MATURE ENOUGH IN GRADING MY ASSIGNMENT SERIOUSLY..
por Carlos R S J
•It is good, but there is a student speaking that is really difficult to understand.
por karuppuchamy.v
•Exteremely good course for those who r doing research ....Thanks to whole Team.
por Joseph V B B
•It is very good for undergraduate students starting their research projects
por Debyani R
•Please make it easier to understand the peer-grade assignment and process.
por Derrick G
•not very useful because there are few examples of it.
por Wisam A W
•A good summary on how to start thinking research!
por David E F G
•The grading is a mess. The content is good.
por Vincentius A B
•Somewhat not really practical
por Olga T
•Very basic
por Ravindra M
•good
por Mohsan U A
•Good
por RANAKISHOR P
•Good
por Zandro A
•I higly recommend to revise the scoring rubrics for the assignment -checklist. I dont see it fare to give between 75 and 100 for the score to the fact that we made an effort doing the checklist better to other options such as 80 or 85 orchange the checlist instead since wehave different style in making a checklist. Thanks and more power still a good and interesting course
por Ghadeer
•A laughable course and very poorly prepared, almost a complete waste of time if not for the final exercise
por Adlirrahman A M
•The course is great but the peer reviews by other participant are horrible
por ABDULLAH B
•Excellent course for PHD students only.
por Helena V B
•This review is not about the course itself but the unenrollment.
I am not able to unenroll this course which is kind of annoying because I am not able to follow this course due to personal reasons. So I would like to unenroll but it is not possible which is kind of stupid.
I do think this is a great course for PhD students, but not for me since I'm not even close to a PhD
por Mona A E E
•language is not clear as English isnt the original language of the instructor .Really I cant completee the course as i cant understand their accent at all
por Ahmed E
•Very bad
por Allena V S A 8
•ok ok
Coursera Footer
