SR
13 de nov. de 2017
A very interesting course and it has given a great knowleddge to me about the concept of science and religion . just amazed and the professors taught this in a very impressive way . very nyccc .
RR
13 de may. de 2017
Fine course, nice references for further reading, clear and nice instructors. Only two where a little odd: Statis Psillos, talking too fast, and Conor Cunningham, a bit too theatrical.
por Alexander W
•20 de sep. de 2017
Disappointed by the complete and apparent academic bias presented here. Utter lack of scientific knowledge and favoritism to only one religion by some of the professors. Very dishonest. This university should be ashamed.
por Jared E
•1 de oct. de 2018
No substance. This is all very low level stuff. I can't say that there is actually any engagement between science and philosophy here. Let's talk a bit about nested structures next time. Mmkay.
por Bucur B
•6 de feb. de 2017
It is a poor propaganda for religious. It even claims that creationism should be regarded as a viable alternative to evolution!
por Douglas R A d O
•16 de may. de 2017
The course misrepresents the scientific knowledge and makes religious proselytism.
por Jennifer F
•19 de may. de 2017
it's like listening to trump talk about science if he used big words.