The final project was very difficult to troubleshoot. When tests failed there is zero guidance or info on what unit tests were being run and what specifically failed. Solving this was like finding a needle in a haystack. Honestly, this method of learning is is not great as their is no explanation on what i did wrong.

Great work explaining and all but the only place i feel that could be done better is the code review part.The Instructor is just reading the code parts I feel it would be much more intresting to see live coding and designing the smart contracts with a jist of its idea at the begining.

It makes it very distracting to listen to the teachers pronunciations of the word "development", "events", amongst many others to the point I had to enable subtitles and read along while watching the lectures. The stress on the English language is completely off

Basic course on solidity. Week 3 is the important one. Two first weeks are very basic, learning basic datatype, structs and all that. If you know Java or any other programming language is not so usefull. Week 4 is best practices that are helpfull for future work

The course videos were good. And so was the reading material. But I expected a more challenging version of the exercises that were provided. Since this is a course that is taught by someone from the university, I hoped for a more challenging exercises.

Needs a little work - programming tasks/assignments during the first 4 lessons to practice for the final assignment. Incremental learning instead of waiting to the end of the course with one big ass

please to describe more about solidity, since the programming project more complicated than the videos and i searched on other websites to understand solidity language basics

Best regards ..

In general course content and delivery was good. I still wish the final assignments are more challenging and require more time to solve so that a real-world experience can be gained.

Final assignment had issues and I didn't get any support for timely completion. May be there should be a way to highlight the exact problem if file is not getting complied propoerly

This course was a bit difficult to follow at times because it is pretty outdated. I would highly recommend updating the content, as the instructions were incredibly confusing.

The material felt more out of date than blockchain basics, i think because Remix keeps changing. A warning about this early on instead of later would have helped.

Course materials need to be updated. Uses old version of solidity, so not up to most modern standards and features. Some quiz questions seem irrelevant

Less interesting than the "Basics" session (from a developer point of view).

Yet the major solidity words are explained.

T​he course is on very old version of solidity. A lot of them is not applicable to how we code in the recent version.

Without at least an indicator of which area of final project fails grader it gets difficult to know what to look for

Not being a native English speaker, I found a bit of difficulty with the teacher's colorful pronunciation.

A lot of the code is really outdated. I had to do a lot of my own research to catch up to latest version.

Course is good but there is clearly a bug in the evaluation process of week 4. You have to work on it.

Very basic. Final programming assignment pretty much spoon-feeds you the answers through the hints.

Good content, but I wish it was presented better. The teacher blandly reads out from a prompter.

The explanation of the keywords in the example smart contracts should be given more clearly.

I would have liked a more in-depth approach for the Solidity language courses.

I think there should be more practice to get hands on solidity .

Nice course but there is need for improvement in course content

I think there should be more exercise.