Chevron Left
Volver a Introduction to User Experience Design

Opiniones y comentarios de aprendices correspondientes a Introduction to User Experience Design por parte de Instituto de Tecnología de Georgia

6,569 calificaciones

Acerca del Curso

The focus of this course is to introduce the learner to User Experience (UX) Design User Experience design is design that is user centered. The goal is to design artifacts that allow the users to meet their needs in the most effective efficient and satisfying manner. The course introduces the novice to a cycle of discovery and evaluation and a set of techniques that meet the user's needs. This course is geared toward the novice. It is for learners that have heard about "user experience" or "user interface" design but don't really know much about these disciplines. The course mantra is that “Design is a systematic and data driven process.” Design is systematic because it is based on a set of techniques and also on a cycle of discovery. In this course the learner is introduced to the four step user interface design cycle. Along the way learners are exposed to a set of techniques to gather information about a) what the user needs b)how to design and model interfaces based on these and then how to evaluate the design to ascertain that the user's goals are met. These techniques are tools that are used in a standardized manner and give us the data we use in our design. This means that anyone (regardless of their current training) that is willing to learn these techniques and follow the proposed cycle can be a UX designer!...

Principales reseñas


22 de oct. de 2017

The best introduction classes, gives an overall idea about UI/UX. Grateful for the efforts taken by the Georgia Tech and Coursera. Looking forward to see more courses related to my career. Thank you.


4 de oct. de 2020

It was fair introduction to UI / UX. I moved away from front-end development a long time ago but wanted to know about the new techniques used prior to starting that sort of development these days.

Filtrar por:

1426 - 1450 de 1,491 revisiones para Introduction to User Experience Design

por Fiona L

5 de may. de 2022

very high level overview with introductions into the terminology and processes.

por Juan B

27 de oct. de 2020

it's very good presented an easy to understand. I was expecting some more depth

por Yuchen Z

7 de sep. de 2017

it is really an introductory course, therefore very easy and basic ideas

por Yan K

26 de abr. de 2020

Материала мало и много воды, много вопросов тестов высосано из пальца.

por Celine B

7 de jun. de 2020

Je m'attendais plus à une formation orientée sur le design des UI

por Priya R

7 de jul. de 2018

This course was too basic, despite being an introductory course.

por Binesh P S

22 de oct. de 2021

It will be very help full for my carrier growth, thank you

por Pooja L

16 de ene. de 2019

Really basic. Only quizzes to pass no practical projects.

por Jeremy R

20 de abr. de 2017

visualized examples? - good content but lacked engagement

por Fanny L J S

26 de abr. de 2022

cuestinarios muy extensos se debe realizar mas pausas.

por Meiren C

4 de sep. de 2021

The instruction and quiz in Week 4 are very confusing.

por Shayan G

29 de may. de 2022

I think Google offers one that is much more practical

por Margarita S

6 de ene. de 2021

It was ok, a little more difficult than I thought

por Saarth H

6 de sep. de 2021

Easy and Flexible Intro course into UX Design

por E. C C

14 de abr. de 2017

Very simple overview of the UX process.

por Tochukwu A

15 de abr. de 2021

Good foundation though too academic.

por Huzaifa S K

8 de sep. de 2020

This course was quiet an easy one.

por Julie B

14 de oct. de 2016

Good base to start building a site

por Attif A

23 de may. de 2021

It was useful and informative.

por Vanessa w

6 de nov. de 2016

A little too common sense.

por Ada B

17 de jul. de 2022

A little bit too basic.

por Nivedita

10 de mar. de 2017

Easy to understand

por Dinesh D

26 de feb. de 2021

I love the course

por Róża T

10 de nov. de 2016

Lack of examples.