Aprender>
Negocios>
Fundamentos Empresariales>
Auditing I: Conceptual Foundations of Auditing curso>
Material Misstatements Part I

Loading...

Material Misstatements Part I

This course provides an intensive conceptual and applied introduction to auditing in society. It focuses on concepts and applications related to financial-statement auditors’ professional responsibilities as well as major facets of the audit process including risk assessment and audit reporting. In the U.S. financial-statement audits and related services generally are provided by Certified Public Accountants (CPAs). To succeed in this course, you should anticipate engaging in critical thinking and thoughtful communication about audit professionals' decision environments, decision processes, and deliverables. Additionally, you should understand the macro-level learning objectives in each of the course's weekly modules.

Impartido por:

Mark E. Peecher, PhD, CPA
Associate Dean of Faculty and Deloitte Professor of Accountancy

Transcripción

So let's start off with a definition of materiality.

What does it mean when something is material?

You probably have a layperson's definition,

something is material to you that matters.

But within the financial statement context,

materiality is the magnitude of the misstatement,

that makes it probable that the judgment of a reasonable person, relying on

that information, would reach

a different conclusion, or that their conclusion would be influenced by that misstatement.

So it's interesting, isn't it?

It's not only changing their conclusion, but influencing their conclusion.

And the person we're talking about here it's not just any investor,

but a reasonable person.

When it comes right down to who is and is not a reasonable person,

that's really beyond the scope of the course,

but if I ever were to be a case that's litigated,

it would be determined within a court system or outside of

a court system sometimes by independent third parties called mediators or arbitrators.

So, when the auditor says I'm obtaining reasonable assurance,

it's very important for you to realize that they're not obtaining

reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free of misstatement period.

No, it's that they are free of material misstatement.

Let's look a little bit more deeply, audit learners, at material misstatements.

I want to share some of the factors that auditors examine when trying to plan

the audit or when looking at

a misstatement that they have located and trying to get a sense of,

is this something that we need to require of management

to adjust their books because that's material, or is it

something that if management pushes back that we can at least

discuss amongst the audit team and realize that it's it's probably not material?

So go back to the basics,

a material difference is a difference that could affect

the decisions of a reasonable decision maker who uses the financial statements.

Material to whom, you might ask.

And you might also ask, what about small misstatements?

And you see an illusion there to PCAOB AS 14.

PCAOB, again, is the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

They are the body that's responsible for

both drafting and creating Auditing Standards and

also enforcing compliance with

those standards for publicly traded companies in the United States.

There are other standard setting bodies such as the AICPAS,

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants

audit standards board, and they would apply to all non-registrants...

non-public registrants in the United States.

And it's a very similar idea here.

But as we talk about what is material,

one question is, material to whom?

The primary users of financial statements

from your financial reporting class, if you remember,

are investors and creditors.

That's exactly what you said, right?

Investors and creditors, but there are other users, right? Such as regulators,

suppliers, and customers, maybe members of a professional guild or body.

And again, it's not...any decision maker is reasonable decision makers.

So let's talk about attributes that can make a misstatement material.

In particular, using those attributes to say what

might make a small quantitative misstatement,

nonetheless material because of qualitative reasoning.

The best way to do this would be for the auditor to

not assess this based on what they think as an auditor,

but what they think

these main decision makers, who rely on the financial statements, think.

So, what I'm getting at here is that for you to assess materiality,

how material is a error that you have found,

you need to think about stepping into the shoes of

reasonable investors to assess the degree to

which a proposed audit adjustment is material.

That conceptually is a very good idea.

Now, I'll get to some reasons why it is hard,

I do have the note to that perspective taking is difficult and I'll go into why,

but let's just toggle back to what about small misstatements and then the

idea of needing to step into the shoes of a reasonable investor.

What do investors think about?

Okay, let's just think about what investors look at.

Do investors care about just the size of

the misstatement, or is the direction of the misstatement also important?

Suppose I tell you you have for $100 million of net income,

suppose I tell you there is a $10 million misstatement.

Now, is your answer about how important that going to be differ,

does it differ, if that's a $10 million overstatement.

That the income should have been 90 million or $10 million understatement,

that the reported income should have been 110 million.

If you're like most investors,

you care more deeply about areas of overstatement than understatement.

So keep that in mind, if you're an audit firm and you say, Well,

in guiding our planning of the audit,

we're going to say that any misstatement that is greater than

5% of net income is material.

Maybe you need to rethink that and say,

if 5% understatements of net income are material,

maybe a 3% overstatement of net income is material.

One thing you would not want to say is that, well,

it needs to be a 5% overstatement and a 3% understatement.

That would be very unusual.

So step back, think about how reasonable investors

would react to overstatements versus understatements.

And it's easy to do at one level there because if you ask yourself,

if management has an incentive to misstate,

what direction would a misstatement tend to go, understatements or overstatements?

Well when it comes to things like assets and revenues,

it's typically going to be overstatements.

When it comes to things like liabilities and expenses,

it tends to be understatements.

Acerca de Coursera

Cursos, programas especializados y títulos en línea impartidos por los principales instructores de las mejores universidades e instituciones educativas del mundo.

Join a community of 40 million learners from around the world

Earn a skill-based course certificate to apply your knowledge

Gain confidence in your skills and further your career

Coursera brinda acceso universal a la mejor educación del mundo, al asociarse con las mejores universidades y organizaciones, para ofrecer cursos en línea.

© 2019 Coursera Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.

Descargar en la App Store

Consíguelo en Google Play