So greenhouse gas accounting is not too hard to do, at least the simple stuff.
>> So that would be a starting place, because it uses energy, it would create
a baseline that looked at energy-saving [INAUDIBLE] or something like that?
>> Yes, absolutely, yeah.
>> So parallels to water, to materials, to waste,
do you see any of those similar things?
>> Yeah, I'm not as familiar with those areas, but
certainly measuring water consumption is doable.
Deforestation, I understand the CDP looks at as well.
I've not I'm not as familiar with that area.
>> So when you're reporting something, you've got a company.
And let's suppose it emits 150 metric tons of CO2 during a year.
There's another company, and it emits 450, 50 metric tons, so 150, 450.
>> Yes. >> Is 150 better than 450?
>> Simplistically, yes, but
in terms of scale obviously you need to allow for the fact that one company,
one's emitting three times more but they might be doing ten times more business.
So comparing the number of tons of carbon dioxide emitted
to how much their sales are or how many customers they have or
something in terms of size, it's a denominator.
[CROSSTALK] >> Intensity.
>> Yeah.
>> And really what we're trying to do is decouple economic activity from
carbon emission group.
>> Yes.
>> Absolutely really like so
we'd like that measure >> One day we'll get there.
[LAUGH] >> [LAUGH]
>> Yeah, in an ideal world,
what would a sustainability report do if already kind of revealed some of the, but,
maybe go over it again.
What would you really like to see?
So what kind of components would you have in the-
>> Yeah,
a study with a simple framework is a good start.
And so, you mentioned the B Lab Impact Assessment is a great start.
>> What's the value of using a GRA template rather than just going off
on your own?
Is there any value in that?
>> There may will be.
The GRA approach has changed over the years, but nevertheless,
is still relatively focused on beet companies.
So, yeah, I guess I wouldn't particularly encourage that as an approach.
Certainly not as a first approach.
>> Okay, good, just too complicated as a starting place?
>> And, yeah, and somewhat overwhelming.
>> Any last comments?