This course introduces acoustics by using the concept of impedance. The course starts with vibrations and waves, demonstrating how vibration can be envisaged as a kind of wave, mathematically and physically. They are realized by one-dimensional examples, which provide mathematically simplest but clear enough physical insights. Then the part 1 ends with explaining waves on a flat surface of discontinuity, demonstrating how propagation characteristics of waves change in space where there is a distributed impedance mismatch.
Lecture 5-2 Part 1. Snell's Law 2
Loading...
Del curso dictado por Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Intro to Acoustics (Part 1)
15 calificaciones
De la lección
Waves on a Flat Surface of Discontinuity 2
You will going to learn more about the waves on a discontinuity. With the Snell's Law, you will be able to find out the wave propagation after transmission and reflection on discontinuity.
Conoce a los instructores
Yang-Hann KimProfessor
Mechanical Engineering
The last lecture, we actually reviewed
a very well known law, which is Snell's Law.
That essentially determines How the,
>> [SOUND]
>> If you have two different regions,
characterized by specific impedance of media,
let's call this is instant web.
It has certain pressure amplitude complex pi,
and then propagating in the direction
that has instant angle Zed to I,
so this has to be wave number
beta multiplied by R, and
this wave number beta K Of course,
has three components, kx, ky, and
kz in the direction of in its vector
IGK if I use the rectangular coordinate.
But essentially, it says that it is propagating into space
with wave number K, okay.
This is simply the projection of wave number upon x, y, and z direction.
Of course in two dimensional case for
2D case, k has only kx and
ky, and in this case, kx has to be k.
That's the wave number, number of wave per unit length propagating in this direction.
K, and if I use the coordinate,
That is x and y, then it means that is
kx cosine k cosine theta i.
And the ky has to be k sine theta.
>> Okay.
And also, the reflected wave,
Pr, has to be complex magnitude Pr, and
then I have exponential j omega t.
Maybe I use plus over here, k dot r,
and then recognize that that has to be kr, that has to be ki.
And this has to be ki, okay?
The transmitted wave can be written
similarly, that it has complex magnitude, and propagating in
Certain wave number that has to be k t.
Okay.
[COUGH] So,
this is what we assumed that if you have a two different media,
we assume that there will be some wave reflected and
some wave is transmitted.
Of course, that has to be reflected angle, and
that has to be transmitted angle.
Okay, The issue, the question is,
what is
the relation between theta i, theta r and theta t?
And how the translated y with respect to pr and
reflected y with respect to pi, has to be.
The first one we call transmission corruption,
the second one we call reflective corruption.
[SOUND] Okay,
of course there
can be found
from where?
For the physical condition at interference,
what is the physical condition of interference?
Pressure has to be z, the velocity has to be z.
But because this is the oblique instance case.
We have a two component.
One is pressure in X direction, the other one is pressure in Y direction,
the velocity in X direction and velocity in Y direction.
And because notes that the fluid is inviscid.
[SOUND]
>> [COUGH]
>> What do I mean by inviscid?
Simply, there is no viscosity,
because there is no viscosity, the pressure in Y direction.
Okay, that's not necessarily to be same.
In other words, because there is no viscosity,
if I excite a fluid over there, then this fluid will not move.
Okay?
The only pressure that has to be matched
on this surface on this continuity has to be pressure in X direction,
and the velocity in X direction, and the velocity in Y direction.
Okay, that gives us the solution about this relation,
and this relation, as well as this relation.
Okay?
Having an understanding the [INAUDIBLE] associate with
[INAUDIBLE] will go to the case.
When we have different material,
different type of flat surface of this continuity.
For example, what if we
have infinite plate?
>> Okay, we have an infinite plate and
suppose the wave is instant of from this direction,
and the wave Then the y will be reflected.
And of course the y will be transmitted.
We would like to especially know the this.
Look like.
And also we want to know Pt in terms of the characteristics of this boundary.
Because this is plate, plate means the physical sort
of component that can transmit the random rigidity.
Compare with a membrane, that can transmit the attention.
Okay and we would like to relate this
one with what we learned before.
Tau is related with what?
Fluid loading impedance, in the previous chapter.
[COUGH]
Partition impedance plus impedance.
That's what we learned and
that can be applied to the general partition
case when we have normal instance, and
because that is related with this one is related with a radiation.
Into fluid medium.
Okay?
So we would like to see how this kind of flat surface of this.
In other words, if the plate,
infinite plate, carriers the wave,
which you will call bending wave.
In this direction, bending wave, will properate in this direction.
And the wave number of bending wave, kb, has to be related with wave number
of this and that and that one, and that is our interest.
Provide kb, how this
one is related with,
related with ki kr and a kt.
That would be our interest.
Okay?
And then our final objective
of this lecture would be.
We started the transmission loss and
transmission corruptions, how the pt is related to pr.
Or the infinite case, how is the infinite case related with the finite case?
Okay, the transmission question or transmission loss,
that is determined or predicted by assuming the plane is infinite.
Predict upper bound or lower bound of transmission loss.
Okay, so for example if we want to.
Predict transmission loss of this kind of case
[COUGH] What is related with tau, infinite,
tau, finite, how those are related?
Okay?
This is very interesting approach.
So, I want to compare this with this.
Per unit area.
Okay, I'm
saying transmission question the per unit area of this case.
Infinite case and the finite case.
Okay, one simple way to look at this,
is let's look at the transmission loss of
this region.
Note that all case
[COUGH] transmission lost,
transmission collection is obtained as if this is
radiating sound through the medium.
Okay, if radiation of this kind of plate
is larger than the radiation of this kind in an infant case
then we have bigger transmission loss or
transmission corruption before the final case right?
But if you look at this case, compare with that case,
and suppose we have
a fluid particle over here, and fluid particle over here.
Okay, because of the etch effect.
Okay, suppose we have
very large structure for
having the concept
Rather than the exaggerated way.
Obviously I can effectively radiate more radiation compared with that case.
So I can argue that the transmission coefficient,
which is the ratio between Pt and Pi.
Well the finite k has to be larger than
transmission coefficient of infinite case.
So therefore I can say the transmission
coefficient in DV scale, that is one over t infinity or
t finite not only to the scale.
That is transformation law.
For infinite case, always bigger than
transmission laws for the finite.
Therefore, what we can estimate RTL
transmission laws By assuming that the plate
is infinite always predict upper bound of
transmission loss of finite k, so therefore what we,
Estimate transmission loss based on infinite is very useful.
It's very useful because as, because if we have upper bounds transmission
losss, maybe I use equality over there.
I over estimate the transmission loss,
therefore I can argue that what we estimated is very safe
estimation in terms of transmission loss.
So this is useful, this is therefore very useful.
So that will be our conclusion of this lecture.
Let me begin with the issue that I just got this,
and the review what we have,
in this relation, since using PowerPoint.
Okay as I said before the instant wavelengths could
be like this because the instant wave is propagating in this direction.
And the reflected wavelengths has to be this amount.
And transmitted wave has to be this amount.
As you can see here geometrically it
shares the same identity over there.
So lambda t, lambda t
has to be same as the lambda I
sine of the instance angle and
the lambda r sine theta r.
Sorry, the other way around.
So this has to be saying, that gives me the famous Snell's Law.
And it is interesting if you look at this Snell's Law in terms of wave number,
that says ki sine theta-i equals to kr sine theta-r,
and that has to be same as kt sine theta-t.
Personally I think that is interesting.
Because that means in terms of wave number,
the projected wave number upon the surface of this continuity,
the surface of this continuity has to be same.
That makes sense, number of waves propagating
on the surface of this continuity has to be same.
If I say again number, wave numbers of an incident wave and
number of waves of reflected wave, and
number of waves of transmitted wave has to be same.
So if you use that concept, okay, so this is incident wave and
this is, for example, reflected wave.
The interesting thing physics can be observed very easily over here.
So sine theta zero is for example this is K zero and
the K zero sine theta zero has to be this length.
Has to be same as the k1.
K1 sine theta i, that is this amount.
So this one has to be same as this one.
No problem until k, I mean if it reaches to
the some critical angle, over there,
then this has to be reached this amount therefore in this case,
theta i, theat 1 has to be 90 degree.
So if it exceed the critical frequency dramatically it has to be this amount.
Therefore ki there is no way to make ki say sine zeta, i has to be this amount.
So one simple way is to make zeta i is greater than pi over 2.
I'm introducing some imaginary part over there, okay, mathematically.
And you will see we need to put the minus sign over there, okay?
So that produce interesting
phenomena because we have the wave
propagating more then angle pi over 2.
And because of this contribution we have evanescent wave.
In other words, wave is decreasing with respect to,
for example if you have this interface in
respect to that distance, now for
the wave is very confined in the vicinity of the interface.
So that is very interesting phenomena which
can be seen by using the approach.
Explora nuestro catálogo
Inscríbete de manera gratuita y obtén recomendaciones personalizadas, actualizaciones y ofertas.
Coursera brinda acceso universal a la mejor educación del mundo, al asociarse con las mejores universidades y organizaciones, para ofrecer cursos en línea.
© 2018 Coursera Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
