5.4.1 Lebanon's Civil Wars - Part 1

Loading...

Del curso dictado por Tel Aviv University

The Emergence of the Modern Middle East - Part II

247 calificaciones

Tel Aviv University

The Emergence of the Modern Middle East - Part II

247 calificaciones

This course will discuss the developments in the Middle East from the early 20th century to the present. It will discuss the rise and retreat of Arab nationalism, the problems of internal cohesion of the Arab states, issues of religion and state, and the evolution of Islamist politics. It will also focus on the evolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict and its impact on the region and will conclude with an in depth analysis of the “Arab Spring” by placing these contemporary revolutionary events in their historical context. Please note that this course builds upon a previous course - The Emergence of the Modern Middle East - Part I Learn about the history of the Middle East for a deeper understanding of current regional developments!

De la lección

WEEK 1

Independence and revolutionary politics in the Arab world

V. Arab Independence and Revolution1:48

5.1.1 Egypt: Crisis and Revolution - Part 18:25

5.1.2 Egypt: Crisis and Revolution - Part 26:21

5.2.1 Iraq from the Overthrow of the Hashemites to Saddam Hussein - Part 18:18

5.2.2 Iraq from the Overthrow of the Hashemites to Saddam Hussein - Part 27:29

5.3.1 Syria's Prolonged Instability - Part 18:29

5.3.2 Syria's Prolonged Instability - Part 28:15

5.4.1 Lebanon's Civil Wars - Part 17:28

5.4.2 Lebanon's Civil Wars - Part 29:55

5.5. The Surprising Stability of the Arab Monarchies3:37

5.5.1.1 The Surprising Stability of the Arab Monarchies: Jordan - Part 19:06

5.5.1.2 The Surprising Stability of the Arab Monarchies: Jordan - Part 27:57

5.5.2 The Surprising Stability of the Arab Monarchies: Saudi Arabia8:13

5.6 The Arab Cold War2:16

Conoce a los instructores

Professor Asher Susser
Senior Research Fellow
Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies

Moving on from Syria to the other of the French mandated territories,

brings us to the story of Lebanon and

Lebanon's history of instability and indeed, occasional civil war.

The 1926 constitution on the basis of which

the Lebanese Republic was formed was based on the confessional system.

Whereby power was divided between the religious communities

according to their relative size.

It rapidly transpired that the creation of Greater Lebanon

was a fateful error on the Christian's part.

Higher national increase and lower rates of immigration

consistently shifted the demographic balance in the Muslim's favor.

And in the Muslim's favor in the Lebanese case particularly meant

the Shiite Muslim minority in Lebanon.

By the census of 1932, only 51 percent were Christians.

No more official counts were taken in Lebanon.

Clearly, the Christians did not want the obvious truth to be known,

that they had lost the majority in the meantime.

There was as a result an internal Maronite debate on how to handle the problem

of safeguarding the status of the Maronites

in a county in which their numbers were steadily decreasing.

There were two schools of thought in the Maronite community.

One led by Emile Edde.

And the other, Bishara al-Khury.

Edde believed in a smaller Lebanon.

In which those parts that were added onto Mount Lebanon to crate Greater Lebanon,

which included large non-Christian populations.

Ought to be seated and to have this smaller Lebanon protected by France.

Bishara al-Khury on the other hand,

believed that the Lebanese Maronites would only be secure

if they established an agreement with the Sunni Muslims of Lebanon.

And the Sunni Muslims of the surrounding Arab states.

The Maronite's would not be able to secure their future in the long term through

a foreign power but

through the Sunni Muslim neighbors of the Maronites of Lebanon.

In the eyes of Bisharo Khury.

The preservation of Christian Lebanon was only possible by agreement with

the Arab world.

Rather than French protection.

But in the conditions that were created by World War II the Emile Edde school,

that which was rested on French protection, was completely defeated.

After all,

if France fell to the Nazis how could the Maronites rely on French protection?

If the French could not protect France

how could they ever protect the Christians of Lebanon?

Lebanon now came under British occupation,

as we have already seen in the Syrian case.

And under British occupation, Lebanon was more inclined towards the Arab world and

the British association with the Arabs.

Which was much closer than that of the French.

Thus, came into being, the national pact of 1943.

This unwritten agreement between the Maronites, of Lebanon, and

the Sunni Muslims, the two leading communities.

Led on the Maronites side by Bishara al-Khury, and

on the Sunni side, by Riyad al-Sulh.

An the National Pact of 1943 gave the Maronites political supremacy.

They had the powerful presidency.

The Sunnis got the second spot, which was the premiership.

And the Shi'is, the weakest of the three large communities, got the crumbs.

The speakership of parliament and no more.

In parliament itself, a six to five ratio in favor of the Christians was set

for the parliamentary representation of the people of Lebanon.

Lebanon, according to the national pact,

would not be a bridgehead of foreign influence either.

That is no more the connection to France by some kind of political umbilical cord.

The problem with the, the National Pact,

was how to accommodate change, without collapsing the whole system.

If the National Pact was based on the reality of 1943,

how would the Lebanese system introduce change?

And after Lebanon's final independence in 1946.

The first serious challenge came in 1958, which quickly degenerated into civil war.

In 1958 the challenge of pan-Arabism and it's attraction to the Sunni Muslim

population that upset the political balance in Lebanon domestically speaking.

Pan Arabism under the charismatic leadership of Abdul Nasser was much more

attractive to the Sunni Muslim population than it was to the Marimites,

who never really regarded themselves as part and parcel of the Arab world.

And had a much more western and European orientation, at least in their own eyes.

There were also serious complaints about the demographic shifts

that were not given due political representation.

After all, the Maronites were becoming an ever smaller percentage of the population.

And nevertheless,

preserve their position in this superior spot of the presidency of Lebanon.

The union that came into effect between Egypt and

Syria in February 1958 fanned the flames.

And soon led to an outbreak of civil war between Muslims and

Christians where the Muslims, the Sunnis in particular, were more

enthusiastic about joining the United Arab Republic than the Christians were.

Needless to say.

The Maronite President Camille Chamoun appealed to the United States for

assistance and the landing of US Marines in Beirut in July

1958 restored calm and the political status quo was maintained.

The US military intervention

came on the heels of the establishment of the United Arab Republic and

the overthrow of the pro-western Hashemite regime in Iraq in 1958.

The US was there for taking a stand for

pro-western regimes in the region at the height of the cold war.

But the stability in Lebanon depended in the main on the continued acceptance of

the power sharing agreement between the various religious communities.

This agreement however was steadily undermined until the outbreak of

the second Civil War which tore the country apart from 1975 to 1989.

Explora nuestro catálogo

Inscríbete de manera gratuita y obtén recomendaciones personalizadas, actualizaciones y ofertas.

Coursera brinda acceso universal a la mejor educación del mundo, al asociarse con las mejores universidades y organizaciones, para ofrecer cursos en línea.

© 2018 Coursera Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.

Descargar en la App Store

Consíguelo en Google Play