Economic Structuralism- Raúl Prebisch

Loading...

Del curso dictado por Universiteit Leiden

Political Economy of Institutions and Development

101 calificaciones

Universiteit Leiden

Political Economy of Institutions and Development

101 calificaciones

This course is part of the SDG initiative <http://www.sdginitiative.org/> addressing the UN Sustainable Development Goals, specifically for the following SDGs [1, 8, 10 and 16]. We hope you will join in our efforts to reach the SDG’s in small but measurable and actionable ways, cooperating with Development Done Differently. Expand your impact. You can create a better world. In today’s world, politics and economics are interconnected, but what is the nature of this connectivity? What are the power relationships that shape the world economy today and create new challenges for international institutions facing globalization? What makes some countries wealthier than others? Do we face cultural diversity or fragmentation? Does the type of governance effect economic development and social change or is it the other way around? How do we measure it and how trustworthy is the data? These issues and many more will be examined in this course along with a wide library of sources and a biting criticism.

De la lección

Extra Material

Not for the test - but very good for your general knowledge!

The Invisible Hand - Adam Smith4:12

Utilitarianism - Jeremy Bentham3:17

Relative Backwardness - Alexander Gerschenkron3:55

Classical Liberalism - Friedrich August von Hayek3:49

Keynesianism - John Maynard Keynes3:44

Critical Political Economy - Robert Cox4:08

The Take Off - Walt W. Rostow3:43

Marxism - Karl Marx4:20

Small States - Peter Katzenstein4:17

World Systems Theory - Immanuel Wallerstein3:52

New Institutional Economics- Ronald Coase3:46

Economic Structuralism- Raúl Prebisch3:41

Conoce a los instructores

Richard Thomas Griffiths
Prof. dr.
Faculty of Humanities

Raul Prebisch was born in Tucuman,

Argentina, into a family descended from German settlers.

He studied economics at the University of Buenos Aires and then started to teach

there as a professor of political economics, a post he held until 1948.

At the same time, he worked as a civil servant at the national bank, and

in 1935, became its first governor.

In 1950, he became the executive secretary for

the UN Economic Commission for Latin-American Caribbean, ECLAC.

And later, general secretary for

the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

He died in Santiago, Chile in 1986.

During the depression of the 1930s,

he'd been involved in a difficult trade negotiations on meat and

cereals with Great Britain, which was Argentina's largest market.

The experience rammed home to him,

his countries weak position in trying to extract better trade terms.

He concluded that structurally, the prices for primary products tended to decline

relative to those of manufactured goods, and

that the benefits of international trade tended to go to industrial countries.

In his view, this was an inevitable consequence of the nature of production,

with many producers facing few, and the nature of demand,

where beyond certain income levels, demand for

primary products tended to grow more slowly and that for industrial goods.

He postulated a world where Europe and the United States were the center and

the rest formed the periphery.

The terms of trade would always move against the periphery, and

this would act as a form of exploitation.

The answer as he perceived it, was to promote structural change and

industrialization in his own country.

Similar ideas were also being formulated by a British economist Hans Singer.

They're often referred to as the Prebisch Singer thesis.

But it was Prebisch who did the most to promote them.

He turned his position in the ECLAC into a platform for

advocating import substitution policies and inward development.

And he has used his role in ONTAD to press for preferential trade conditions for

primary producers.

Prebisch was not a revolutionary, but a reformer trying to work within the system.

And whatever the validity of the original analysis, the solutions,

at least when applied to Latin America, appeared by the 1980s to have failed.

The policies of inward development were all too often employed as excuses for

excess protectionism, for exaggerated development schemes, for

a strangling network of control of regulations.

For the neglect of export competitiveness, and for inflationary public financing.

Triggered by the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s,

the whole edifice began to unravel.

Bankrupt industries, bankrupt governments, and the bankrupt political system

that'll become riddled by clientalism and corruption.

Despite all of this,

the image still persists of poorer countries at the wrong end of the value

chain being disadvantaged by the operation of the international system.

And Prebisch's analysis of economic structuralism has come to underline a more

radical approach by theorists who would view reformers like Raul Prebisch as part

of the problem rather than as part of the solution.

Explora nuestro catálogo

Inscríbete de manera gratuita y obtén recomendaciones personalizadas, actualizaciones y ofertas.

Coursera brinda acceso universal a la mejor educación del mundo, al asociarse con las mejores universidades y organizaciones, para ofrecer cursos en línea.

© 2018 Coursera Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.

Descargar en la App Store

Consíguelo en Google Play