Grading all based on peer reviews would be unfair

Buen curso!, pero debería estar actualizado

The information on UI design is too concise

I'd rather present more live examples.

it was really good I enjoyed

Good, but not up to the mark

excelente

basic

nice

good

The videos and reading material were helpful. I also enjoyed working on the weekly projects. However, I did not like the peer review process. I understand that is the most efficient method to review and grade all of the students' projects. However, it is not a fair process and does not allow for learning and growth. On Week 4, both of my peer reviewers deducted points but failed to write the required complete sentence. Instead, they wrote a single word "Good" after deducting points from my project. How can I learn and improve from such lazy and unfair peer reviews? The peer review process needs to be reevaluated and changed so it is a positive experience for all students.

This course is great. but not outstanding. The course materials are sufficient. but the assignment structure is terrible. So much writing while submitting your assignment, and so many sections that ask for your feedback on your peers' assignments. People, which means peers who are supposed to give you feedback on your work, did not care. They will award you a 1 or even a 0, maybe an exceptional or a 3. However, they will not tell you why?! they just give you a 9 over all and you won't find out why is that?!

That is very awful. The submission and assignment procedure was so inconvenient that I dropped the remaining three courses in this certificated program.

I honestly didn't enjoy this course at all. I found the videos to not be organized well; they were repetitive and speculative. One video trying to teach you one thing could be 10 minutes long just because of the slow, agonizing pace and unnecessary and often unrelated examples. I also believe the peer review system is flawed and not very helpful, especially for a course-long project. If we're all trying to learn something, why are we grading someone else's work? It doesn't make sense. As much as I want to continue with web design, I won't be doing it with this specialization.

Not impressed with course content after reading books like "Don't make me think!" by Steve Krug. I think it misses the point of design patterns implemented in UI libraries like Bootstrap or Material. Peer reviews do not work well on these projects. There is apparently a high degree a subjectivity that influences notation. As other courses on Coursera, I suggest you require 5 reviews and discard the lowest and highest.

Pretty bad, almost dated. Some general information relevant but I've seen much better youtube videos.

Awful and pointless assignments really made this course not enjoyable. I'm not interested in learning applications in order to complete it. I was just after the learning concepts in order to apply them to build sites with frameworks like angular.

This course started out good by when I had to redo and assignment for a class I failed it still has not been graded and I asked serveral times over the last two weeks. I feel like I am being ignored so that I will pay for another subscription. If this continued I will not continue with any further certifications.

The information presented is basic and fundamental, which makes sense for the general public, however the presentation and the visual material provided are extremely outdated and provide poor example for the beginner taking on this course.

Do not buy this course/ specialization. The only person grading your work is some random peer who most likely doesn't care about your assignment and will give you zero for everything. Read the 3 star reviews before you buy.

the course is well structured but no matter, if you submit before deadline lack of reviews, might slow down your progress

I well love more picture for all the explanations because a little bit confusing but the rest wise nice . Thanks

Course without details about grids, designs etc. Only about teoric side

The course content is good but the peer-reviewing system doesn't work.

Interesting but already outdated and lacks modernity

NNot too much detailed explanation on how to design

Peer grading is inconsistent and time consuming.