Waste of my time :( Each module is separated as " weeks", and each week, the audio in the presentation got lower and lower. It feels as if the producer of this course went on Fivr and hired someone to read off PowerPoint slides. Worse of all, in a course about technical writing, one of the quizzes marked questions incorrectly, and in other quizzes multiple questions are often repeated multiple times. In addition, the Quiz are just useless, The Questions & Answers are structured in a way that you can guess the answer with 100% accuracy without even reading the question. As for the content, the style of the presentation provides no value. The information provided can easily be found online. In fact, at the end of each module there are links to random blog post for each topic. The teacher doesn't show any practical examples in depth, or even go through crafting a technical document.

Problems with quiz inaccuracies and audio quality plague the course throughout. There are no hands-on exercises or peer review activities. The learning quality is poor compared to other courses here. I took this through TADA, however, if I had paid for this course I would have requested my money back. Do better.

The course is super general. There is no real examples. How to get 100% in each questionnaire - just choose longest answer thats it. Many repeated questions. The course needs to be updated with real examples and cases. Needs just at least one complete example of how to create one technical document.

The tests have multiple scoring problems and are highly repetitive and can be completed through logic rather than knowledge--that's only when the test grades you properly. The first quiz has 3 questions graded improperly, which means you have to be close to perfect if you want to pass. Other times, my correct answer wasn't acknowledged and I was marked down for putting the wrong answer. It's a mess, honestly. I hope this certification looks good on my LinkedIn but I think anyone in the know would find this course to be a super basic overview.

I am getting some basics but more real life visual examples and hands on practice would enhance this. I am walking away from each lesson not confident I know what the documents should look like upon completion.

Very helpful information for those looking to get started with Technical Writing.

Gave me the needed information and guidance as a beginner in technical writing.

The first quiz has errors in it but the course overall is very informative and I enjoyed the content.

The information is great; however, in a technical writing course someone should review and proofread the transcripts and quizzes for grammatical errors. It was distracting when I came across several incomplete sentences. The course was missing it's own point when it had run on paragraphs and didn't use bullet points instead of lists in the transcripts.

Good information but very hard to understand the speaker.

Course is riddled with errors. The transcripts for videos are often incorrect, but I imagine that is something auto-generated. The real problem is in the quizzes. I believe it is the first quiz that counts some correct answers as incorrect. Multiple other students have given this feedback over some months, with no correction in sight. The third quiz also has the majority of the correct answers starred, and all of them are "C" anyway. I was very disappointed in the content of the course. I had hoped I would be receiving detailed information on the formatting and creation of technical documents. We spent a large amount of time just discussing why Microsoft Word and Adobe Illustrator are good products, networking to get yourself hired, and only barely touched on the intended subject matter of the course. Unfortunately, I will need to find another option to gain the education I actually needed on this subject.

Topical at best, this is helpful to someone who has no clue what tech writing is.

Loved this course so much! Opened my mind a lot of new things I had no idea about. I also enjoyed the further readings, they were more in-depth and were great reads overall.

The speaker is very well versed with the topic and uses plain and understandable language whilst not sacrificing the quality of the content.

This course practices what it teaches (preaches.) Thank you very much.

very organized, concise and easy to understand

Excellent Information

Just finished week 1, so here's a partially done review! So far, this is a *very* beginner friendly course, which I appreciate. There's a lot of good information, and it's well organized. The course itself, I have very little issue with. Though, one note is that on Week 1, I was "taking" the graded quiz ("taking" because I'm not currently upgraded to the paid version, but it suggested I do that to actually submit the quiz once I answered the questions), and I noticed a few issues. First of all, one of the questions seemed to have a typo and/or leak in the answer. The right answer had a * at the end, with no footnote at the bottom. I was also disappointed that, given that it's supposedly paid content (for the grade), I had many repetitive questions in my quiz. I felt like my practice quiz was a better test, sometimes. Otherwise, my only other complaint is that the teacher for the course is at a great volume, but it's not mixed well because at the end of the course, it's suddenly blaring loud with the exiting sounds. Really rough quality of life issue, and I hope that in future videos that becomes less of an issue.

The last quiz has incorrectly worded questions. It asks for items that are NOT characteristics. When the answer is chosen, it marks it as incorrect. The explanation shows that the correct answer was selected.

I think that overall, it is a good course. I am hoping that there will be more exercises and real life examples.

Excellent so far, but #11 on the final quiz has an error in the answer choice and grading.

Very informative course, but the background noise was distracting e.g., horn honking.

Great course

great course

I liked it