Because of the instructor's accent, it took a lot of work to listen to. The writing was not succinct, and I was disappointed. The course structure is good.

The pronunciation is poor. Material is good and well organized. The CEO was not explained and it is in the quiz

The course is not bad. But it is not so engaging. Also I feel bored while taking the course.

Having completed week 1, the following are my observations: 1. The voice of the presenter was low. 2. The explanations of the presenter most times did not synch with the points in the slides presented. 3. Two questions in the graded quiz: questions 1 and 11 are the same but with different answers. Who does that?? 4. I believe this course's creator(s) can do better in creating high-level questions for the students. I was expecting questions that would get me thinking. I did not pen down any points during the lessons but breezed through all the questions. Which is unlike me.

by the way, there is an error in the first graded quiz, unless my brain is really not working today: 11. Question 11 Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of effective technical documents? 0 / 1 point Incomplete information Visual aids and illustrations to enhance understanding A clear table of contents and headings Complex language and jargon Incorrect Effective technical documents should provide complete information.

Lots of errors in the quizzes, repeat questions mainly. In one quiz, all the answers were C. The information was great for a beginner course, but felt my knowledge was not truly tested due to the multitude of errors.